FOOTY fans are divided on the need for a sledging code.
In the wake of round eight's spiteful clashes between St Kilda players and Carlton captain Marc Murphy, we asked for your views on whether the game needed a players' code of conduct.
Fans were split nearly 50/50 over whether players should be sanctioned for 'personal' sledges about an opponent's private life.
Asked about a formal code of conduct governing on-field behaviour, 40 per cent were in favour of a code, while 60 per cent were against.
Here we present a selection of your views on why a sledging code is or isn't needed.
'What happens on the field stays on the field' is just another excuse to allow bullying
People can't get away with that sort of anti-social and nasty behaviour in general life without some form of sanction. Why should AFL footballers be exempt? 'What happens on the field stays on the field' is just another excuse to allow bullying. It's just unacceptable behaviour in this day and age.
- Michael Cowman, Brisbane Qld
Sledging isn't competition, it's weakness
Psychologically beating your opposition with banter is not about sportsmanship. It's not harmless, it's a form of abuse and would not be tolerated in my business. I would fire staff for treating other staff that way. That's not competition in my eyes. It's weakness.
- Richie McNeill, Malvern Vic
Carlton and St Kilda players wrestle during round eight's spiteful clash. Picture: AFL Photos
If you have to stoop to personal remarks, get off
This sort of behaviour sends an awful message
It's time for the game to grow up
- Mike Harding, Lindisfarne Tas
Steve Waugh had it right
- Chris Hamilton, Brisbane Qld
It's football, not tiddlywinks
Marc Murphy walks from the ground after Carlton's loss against the Saints. Picture: AFL Photos
'Any sport is 50 per cent between the ears'
If players can get the upper hand any way they can, they will take it.
It's a tough game played by adults. Let's not treat them like kids.
- Spiro Kontis, South Yarra Vic
'The game has become sterile enough'
- Thomas Roberts, Edgecliffe NSW
This is peanuts compared to parliament
Compared to the vilification in parliament, the niggle on the footy field is a cakewalk.
What makes the footy ground different to any other place of work?
If players wouldn't say it during a press conference, they shouldn't say it on the field
Chat recap: Your draft questions for Cal Twomey
- Dylan Hansen, Carrum Downs Vic
A players' code would be far too subjective
Gone are the days when you would be punished for taking sledging too far by getting knocked out. Now, players are left without any deterrence to do whatever it takes to put off an opponent. However, trying to codify the 'line' of acceptable sledging is far too subjective, and would never function effectively.
- Josh Edwards, Melbourne Vic
Code or no code, there will always be occasional incidents
This is a common sense issue, not something for more rules. If a player crosses the line they get thrust into the spotlight and criticised. This is rarely an issue, which shows peer and public pressure is enough. There will always be occasional moments of people crossing the line whether there's a code or not.
- Matthew Hocking, Adelaide SA
Want more?
• Why the Cats are losing their claws, and how to stop Adelaide